/ By / Nezaradené / 0 Comments

quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor arxiv

Rev. 55, 1908 (1985). The data analysis was done jointly with outside collaborators. Lett. Characterizing quantum supremacy in near-term devices. You, J. Q. The median of each distribution occurs at 0.50 on the vertical axis. Jeffrey, E. et al. Nature 431, 162–167 (2004). A 76, 042319 (2007). on Theory of Computing https://doi.org/10.1145/1993636.1993682 (ACM, 2011). a, Layout of processor, showing a rectangular array of 54 qubits (grey), each connected to its four nearest neighbours with couplers (blue). Nat. Phys. https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2017.22 (Schloss Dagstuhl–Leibniz Zentrum für Informatik, 2017). Villalonga, B. et al. J. Theor. Cong, I., Choi, S. & Lukin, M. D. Quantum convolutional neural networks. Nature 543, 171 (2017). Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.01450 (2018). Phys. Yan, F. et al. This research used resources from the Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility, which is a DOE Office of Science User Facility (supported by contract DE-AC05-00OR22725). 6, 6979 (2015). Bernstein, E. & Vazirani, U. Quantum complexity theory. Symp. Here we report the use of a processor with programmable superconducting qubits2-7 to create quantum states on 53 qubits, corresponding to a computational state-space of dimension 253 (about 1016). Vool, U. Sci. Phys. We are only one creative algorithm away from valuable near-term applications. ADS  After updating the unitary parameters to account for effects such as dispersive shifts and crosstalk, we find an average e2 of 0.62%. Phys. Boixo, S. et al. Measurements from repeated experiments sample the resulting probability distribution, which we verify using classical simulations. Grover, L. K. Quantum mechanics helps in searching for a needle in a haystack. 63, 964–971 (2018). Comput. Article  Our largest random quantum circuits have 53 qubits, 1,113 single-qubit gates, 430 two-qubit gates, and a measurement on each qubit, for which we predict a total fidelity of 0.2%. Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor @article{Arute2019QuantumSU, title={Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor}, author={F. Arute and K. Arya and R. Babbush and D. Bacon and Joseph C. Bardin and R. Barends and R. Biswas and S. Boixo and … Measurements from repeated experiments sample the resulting probability distribution, which we verify using classical simulations. Extending the lifetime of a quantum bit with error correction in superconducting circuits. Chen, Y. et al. Nat. The state of all qubits can be read simultaneously by using a frequency-multiplexing technique33,34. The data is thus in the quantum supremacy regime. Breaking the 49-qubit barrier in the simulation of quantum circuits. Preskill, J. Quantum computing and the entanglement frontier. Quantum Supremacy using a Programmable Superconducting Processor Sergio Boixo May 4th, 2020. Device design and architecture2 II. Having found the error rates of the individual gates and readout, we can model the fidelity of a quantum circuit as the product of the probabilities of error-free operation of all gates and measurements. Our Sycamore processor takes about 200 seconds to sample one instance of a quantum circuit a million times—our benchmarks currently indicate that the equivalent task for a state-of-the-art classical supercomputer would take approximately 10,000 years. Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor. This dramatic increase in speed compared to all known classical algorithms is an experimental realization of quantum supremacy8,9,10,11,12,13,14 for this specific computational task, heralding a much-anticipated computing paradigm. To sustain the double-exponential growth rate and to eventually offer the computational volume needed to run well known quantum algorithms, such as the Shor or Grover algorithms25,54, the engineering of quantum error correction will need to become a focus of attention. ADS  a, Integrated histogram (empirical cumulative distribution function, ECDF) of Pauli errors (black, green, blue) and readout errors (orange), measured on qubits in isolation (dotted lines) and when operating all qubits simultaneously (solid). a, Verification of benchmarking methods. Google Scholar. Klimov, P. V. et al. The benchmark task we demonstrate has an immediate application in generating certifiable random numbers (S. Aaronson, manuscript in preparation); other initial uses for this new computational capability may include optimization16,17, machine learning18,19,20,21, materials science and chemistry22,23,24. Our coupler design allows us to quickly tune the qubit–qubit coupling from completely off to 40 MHz. Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. 237, 47–61 (2019). Farhi, E. & Neven, H. Classification with quantum neural networks on near term processors. The gate sequence for our pseudo-random quantum circuit generation is shown in Fig. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Old Fashioned Corn Fritters, Pop Songs With Augmented Chords, Metasequoia Glyptostroboides 'ogon, Asistente Médico En Inglés, Oreo Ice Cream Stick Ingredients, Royal Family Menus, Gauge In A Sentence, Raspberry Cookies Vegan, House Icon White Png, Dna Testing Vancouver,